Recently
and throughout the past years, lots of dangerous attacks on the country have
taken place. For example, the bombs set off during the Boston marathon and the
car plowing through protesters in Virginia. President Trump thinks a majority
of these attacks were constructed by rivaling nations in the Middle East. He
then decided to issue a travel ban of all refugees or all peoples from certain
Middle Eastern areas entering the U.S. Every new station was covering the
specifics of the ban and gave their biased or unbiased opinion on what this ban
affects the U.S. These articles are very similar in the information they feed
us, but the political views are different and bias between each article
influence how the telling of the story.
One news source reporting on the ban was
the New York Times. The news source has a liberal influence on its viewers. The
article is written in which every party member associated with constructing
this travel ban and the ban itself is criticized. Constantly referring to how
the lack of including Iraq in the bill is a mistake and getting opinions from
just the opposing Republican Party. From start to finish this article it is
clear the writers want to influence the readers that this travel ban has
nothing but a negative effect on the country.
The next news source is CNN, and they reported on the issue. CNN is said to be biased but is said to be more
supporting of the left. But this article is written much unbiased. CNN writers
explain both sides, getting quotes from both sides of the party. On the removal
of Iraq and targeting religious individuals, the writers explain why it was
included in the first order and why it was taken out of the revised travel ban.
Reading the article it didn’t have any bias at all. The article was written for
the reader to form his/her own opinion and not have any influence on the
reader.
Curious to see what an outside the U.S
new source would have to say, the BBC wrote an article about the travel ban
issue. BBC is unbiased but is criticized for having some left wing bias in
certain events covered. This is an article written showing their left bias.
Reviewing the BBC article it is similar to the New York Times. They explain all
facts about the travel ban. But the tone of the article is negative. They don’t
explain the positive reasoning behind the travel ban being placed. The BBC writers
just criticize the ban and explain how it will hurt other nations and itself (U.S).
Fox news, a news source infamously known
for being right wing also covered the travel ban. In their article, just like
all the articles it explains the specifics first and then the tone turns toward
their bias. Fox writers only included
quotes from republican defending the ban. Article coming from right wing
republicans id expect it to be positive. After trump wrote the first travel ban
it was criticized to be re-written. The writer in the article has an angry tone
as if the first travel ban should not have been re-written. And how it’s the
lefts fault for keeping danger out of the country and taking away the safety
the right thinks the country needs.
Finally, NBC also covered the travel ban
topic. NBC stories that are covered are generally favoring the left wing
opinion or perspective. But just like the CNN article this is written with an
unbiased tone. Sharing some quotes from both parties. Quotes explain how this
could danger some refugees seeking help and also sharing how this is being put
into place to protect people living in the U.S. During the time of the ban
Trump called for a temporary ban on Muslims entering the U.S. NBC writers
explained why this could help with safety and how it hurts human rights.
Every article mentioned has influence on
its readers. Whether it is trying to force its favorable point of view or
trying to make the reader make a judgment themselves based on the information
given. Every news source should be unbiased and present both sides so the
reader can form an opinion. Be open to why a certain way of handling things may
be better than what you believe in. But even that way of thinking can also lead
to more judgment.
No comments:
Post a Comment